Predicted erosion patterns on the surface of a pipe fitting can now be obtained using a technique implemented into a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. This comprehensive erosion prediction procedure consists of 1) generation of a flow field simulation, 2) computation of a large number of particle trajectories inside the flow field, and 3) erosion model equations applied as particles impinge the walls of the geometry. Other quantities related to erosion, namely the particle deposition rate as well as local average impingement angle and velocity components, are also stored in the procedure. All predicted quantities (flow solution, particle trajectories, and erosion profiles) are analyzed using a three-dimensional visualization tool that was also developed. The current work focuses on two pipe fittings commonly used in the oil and gas production industry: elbows and plugged tees. First, the flow field and erosion predictions are evaluated through comparisons with experimental data. Erosion predictions yield trends and locations of maximum wear that are consistent with experimental observations. Next, two 90-deg pipe elbows with centerline curvature-to-diameter ratios of 1.5 and 5.0 are analyzed under prescribed erosive conditions. Predicted erosion results are presented in the form of surface contours. Finally, a simulated plugged tee geometry placed under erosive conditions is studied and erosion rates are compared to that of the two elbow test cases.

1.
Bourgoyne, A., 1989, “Experimental Study of Erosion in Diverter Systems due to Sand Production,” Proc., SPE/IADC 1989, Paper No. SPE/IADC 18716, pp. 807–816.
2.
Tolle, G., and Greenwood, D., 1977, “Design of Pipe Fittings to Reduce Wear Caused by Sand Erosion,” API OSAPR Project No. 6, Texas A&M University Research Foundation, College Station, TX.
3.
Shirazi
,
S.
,
McLaury
,
B.
,
Shadley
,
J.
, and
Rybicki
,
E.
,
1995
, “
Generalization of the API RP 14E Guideline for Erosive Service
,”
JPT, J. Pet. Technol.
,
47
, No.
8
, pp.
693
698
.
4.
Salama, M., 1998, “An Alternative to API RP 14E Erosional Velocity Limits for Sand Laden Fluids,” Proc., Offshore Technology Conference 1998, Paper No. OTC-8898, pp. 721–733.
5.
Wang, J., Shirazi, S., Shadley, J., and Rybicki, E., 1996, “Application of Flow Modeling and Particle Tracking to Predict Sand Erosion Rates in Elbows,” ASME FED-Vol. 236, pp. 725–734.
6.
AEA Technology, 1997, CFX 4.2 Flow Solver, AEA Technology, Inc., Oxfordshire, U.K.
7.
Patankar, S., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, 1st Edition, Taylor and Francis.
8.
Edwards, J., Erdal, F., McLaury, B., and Shirazi, S., 1999, “Validation of a Commercially Available CFD Code for Tangentially Injected Swirling Flows and Flow in 90 Degree Elbows,” Proc., ASME FED Summer Meeting, Paper No. FEDSM99-6785.
9.
Clark
,
H.
, and
Burmeister
,
L.
,
1992
, “
The Influence of the Squeeze Film on Particle Impact Velocities in Erosion
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
12
, No.
3
, pp.
415
426
.
10.
Grant
,
G.
, and
Tabakoff
,
W.
,
1975
, “
Erosion Prediction in Turbomachinery Resulting from Environmental Solid Particles
,”
J. Aircr.
,
12
, No.
5
, pp.
471
478
.
11.
Forder
,
A.
,
Thew
,
M.
, and
Harrison
,
D.
,
1998
, “
A Numerical Investigation of Solid Particle Erosion Experienced Within Oilfield Control Valves
,”
Wear
,
216
, pp.
184
193
.
12.
Ahlert, K., 1994, “Effects of Particle Impingement Angle and Surface Wetting on Solid Particle Erosion of AISI 1018 Steel,” M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK
13.
Enayet
,
M.
,
Gibson
,
M.
,
Taylor
,
A.
, and
Yianneskis
,
M.
,
1982
, “
Laser-Doppler Measurements of Laminar and Turbulent Flow in a Pipe Bend
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
3
, pp.
213
219
.
14.
Eyler, R., 1987, “Design and Analysis of a Pneumatic Flow Loop,” M.S. thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
You do not currently have access to this content.