In the last several years, gasification has become an interesting option for biomass utilization because the produced gas can be used as a gaseous fuel in different applications or burned in a gas turbine for power generation with a high thermodynamic efficiency. In this paper, a technoeconomic analysis was carried out in order to evaluate performance and cost of biomass gasification systems integrated with two different types of plant, respectively, for hydrogen production and for power generation. An indirectly heated fluidized bed gasifier has been chosen for gas generation in both cases, and experimental data have been used to simulate the behavior of the gasifier. The hydrogen plant is characterized by the installation of a steam methane reformer and a shift reactor after the gas production and cleanup section; hydrogen is then purified in a pressure swing adsorption system. All these components have been modeled following typical operating conditions found in hydrogen plants. Simulations have been performed to optimize thermal interactions between the biomass gasification section and the gas processing. The power plant consists of a gas-steam combined cycle, with a three-pressure-levels bottoming cycle. A sensitivity analysis allowed to evaluate the economic convenience of the two plants as a function of the costs of the hydrogen and electrical energy.

2.
Paisley
,
M. A.
, and
Welch
,
M. J.
, 2003, “
Biomass Gasification Combined Cycle Opportunities Using the Future Energy Silvagas® Gasifier Coupled to Alstom’s Industrial Gas Turbines
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38294.
3.
Craig
,
K. R.
, and
Mann
,
M. K.
, 1996, “
Cost and Performance Analysis of Biomass-Based Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (BIGCC) Power Systems
,” NREL/TP-43021657 UC Category: 1311-DE96013105.
4.
Mann
,
M. K.
, 1995, “
Techical and Economic Assessment of Producing Hydrogen by Reforming Syngas From the Battelle Indirectly Heated Biomass Gasifier
,” NREL/TP-431–8143 UC Category:1360-DE95009275.
5.
Williams
,
R. H.
,
Larson
,
E. D.
,
Katofsky
,
R. E.
, and
Chen
,
J.
, 1995, “
Methanol and Hydrogen From Biomass for Transportation
,”
Energy for Sustainable Development
,
1
(
5
), pp.
18
34
.
6.
Hamelinck
,
C. N.
, and
Faaij
,
A. P. C.
, 2001, “
Future Prospects for Production of Methanol and Hydrogen From Biomass
,” Utrecht University,
Copernicus Institute
, Science Technology Society, Report No. NWS-E-2001-49, September.
7.
U.S. Department of Energy
, 2002, “
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
,” Web site: www.eere.energy.govwww.eere.energy.gov, Vehicle and Fuel Cells, Fact of the Week, No. 205, Feb.
8.
U.S. Department of Energy
, 2004, “
Hydrogen Posture Plan—An Integrated Research, Development and Demonstration Plan
,” Feb., U.S. DOE, Washington, DC.
9.
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy
, 2004, “
FutureGen—Integrated Hydrogen, Electric Power Production, and Carbon Sequestration Research Initiative
,” U.S. DOE, Washington, DC.
10.
Breault
,
R.
, and
Morgan
,
D.
, 1992, “
Design and Economics of Electricity Production from an Indirectly Heated Biomass Gasifier
,” for Battelle Memorial Institute by Tecogen, Inc., Waltham, MA, Oct. 22.
11.
Parsons Infrastructure & Technology Group
, 2002, “
Hydrogen Production Facilities Plant Performance and Cost Comparisons
,” Final Report, March, prepared for U.S. DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory.
12.
Shilling
,
N. Z.
, and
Lee
,
D. T.
, 2003, “
IGCC–Clean Power Generation Alternative For Solid Fuels
,”
PowerGen Asia 2003 Conference Proc.
,
General Electric Company
,
Schenectady
, pp.
1
9
.
13.
Brdar
,
R. D.
, and
Jones
,
R. M.
, 2000, “
GE IGCC Technology and Experience With Advanced Gas Turbines
,” GE Power Systems, GER-4207 (10/00).
14.
Tomlinson
,
L. O.
, and
McCullough
,
S.
, 1996, “
Single-Shaft Combined-Cycle Power Generation System
,” GE Power Systems, GER-GER-3767C.
15.
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Chiesa
,
P.
, 2002, “
CO2 Sequestration Techniques for IGCC and Natural Gas Power Plants: A Comparative Estimation of Their Thermodynamic and Economic Performance
,”
Proc. of International Conference on Clean Coal Technologies (CCT2002)
,
Chia Laguna, Italy
, Oct.
16.
Padró
,
C. E. G.
, and
Putsche
,
V.
, 1999, “
Survey of the Economics of Hydrogen Technologies
,” NREL/TP-570-27079, Sept.
17.
Haug
,
M.
, 2004, “
Hydrogen—IEA Activities and Perspective
,”
DTI: A UK/US Vision for Hydrogen Technology Conference
, London, Oct. 11–12.
You do not currently have access to this content.