In the past we have developed the Generalized Eigensystem techniques for solving inverse boundary value problems in steady heat conduction, and found that these vector expansion methods often give superior results to those obtained with standard Tikhonov regularization methods. However, these earlier comparisons were based on the optimal results for each method, which required that we know the true solution to set the value of the regularization parameter (t) for Tikhonov regularization and the number of mode clusters for In this paper we introduce a sensor sensitivity method for estimating appropriate values of for We compare those results with Tikhonov regularization using the Combined Residual and Smoothing Operator (CRESO) to estimate the appropriate values of t. We find that both methods are quite effective at estimating the appropriate parameters, and that often gives superior results to Tikhonov regularization even when is estimated from measured data.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Technical Papers
The Steady Inverse Heat Conduction Problem: A Comparison of Methods With Parameter Selection
Robert Throne,
Robert Throne
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588
Search for other works by this author on:
Lorraine Olson, Fellow ASME
Lorraine Olson, Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Department of Engineering Mechanics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert Throne
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588
Lorraine Olson, Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Department of Engineering Mechanics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588
Contributed by the Heat Transfer Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. Manuscript received by the Heat Transfer Division February 18, 2000; revision received February 1, 2001. Associate Editor: D. A. Kaminski.
J. Heat Transfer. Aug 2001, 123(4): 633-644 (12 pages)
Published Online: February 1, 2001
Article history
Received:
February 18, 2000
Revised:
February 1, 2001
Citation
Throne, R., and Olson, L. (February 1, 2001). "The Steady Inverse Heat Conduction Problem: A Comparison of Methods With Parameter Selection ." ASME. J. Heat Transfer. August 2001; 123(4): 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1372193
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Bayesian Inference for Estimating Heat Sources through Temperature Assimilation
J. Heat Mass Transfer
The Effect of U-bend Zone, Rotation, and Corrugation on Two-Pass Channel Flow
J. Heat Mass Transfer
Exergy and Entropy Analysis of Heat Exchanger Under Mechanical Vibration and Magnetic Field
J. Heat Mass Transfer (January 2025)
Related Articles
BEM Solution With Minimal Energy Technique for the Geometrical Inverse Heat Conduction Problem in a Doubly Connected Domain
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2003)
Determination of Temperatures and Heat Fluxes on Surfaces and Interfaces of Multidomain Three-Dimensional Electronic Components
J. Electron. Packag (December,2004)
An Algorithm Study on Inverse Identification of Interfacial Configuration in a Multiple Region Domain
J. Heat Transfer (February,2009)
An Inverse Determination of Unsteady Heat Fluxes Using a Network
Simulation Method
J. Heat Transfer (December,2003)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Analysis of Shutdown Mode at BarsebÄck 2; an Approach to a Combined PSA, HFA and Deterministic Analysis (PSAM-0117)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Introduction
Introduction to Finite Element, Boundary Element, and Meshless Methods: With Applications to Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow