Though little research has been done in the field of over-design as a product development strategy, an over-design approach can help products avoid the issue of premature obsolescence. This paper compares over-design to redesign as approaches to address the emergence of future requirements. Net present value (NPV) analyses of several real world applications are examined from the perspective of manufacturers (i.e., defense contractors, automobile, pharmaceutical, and microprocessor manufactures) and customers (i.e., purchases of vehicles, televisions, cell phones, washing machines, and buildings). This analysis is used to determine the conditions under which an over-design approach provides a greater benefit than a redesign approach. Over-design is found to have a higher NPV than redesign when future requirements occur soon after the initial release, discount rates are low, initial research, and development cost or price is high, and when the incremental costs of the future requirements are low.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2019
Research-Article
Over-Design Versus Redesign as a Response to Future Requirements
Jeffrey D. Allen,
Jeffrey D. Allen
Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: jeffallen@byu.edu
Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: jeffallen@byu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Phillip D. Stevenson,
Phillip D. Stevenson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: philstevenson91@gmail.com
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: philstevenson91@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher A. Mattson,
Christopher A. Mattson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Nile W. Hatch
Nile W. Hatch
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffrey D. Allen
Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: jeffallen@byu.edu
Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: jeffallen@byu.edu
Phillip D. Stevenson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: philstevenson91@gmail.com
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: philstevenson91@gmail.com
Christopher A. Mattson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu
Brigham Young University,
Provo, UT 84602
e-mail: mattson@byu.edu
Nile W. Hatch
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Design Theory and Methodology Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN. Manuscript received March 30, 2018; final manuscript received December 14, 2018; published online January 10, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Irem Tumer.
J. Mech. Des. Mar 2019, 141(3): 031101 (13 pages)
Published Online: January 10, 2019
Article history
Received:
March 30, 2018
Revised:
December 14, 2018
Citation
Allen, J. D., Stevenson, P. D., Mattson, C. A., and Hatch, N. W. (January 10, 2019). "Over-Design Versus Redesign as a Response to Future Requirements." ASME. J. Mech. Des. March 2019; 141(3): 031101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4042335
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Studying Dynamic Change Probabilities and Their Role in Change Propagation
J. Mech. Des (October,2020)
Toward Quantifiable Evidence of Excess’ Value Using Personal Gaming Desktops
J. Mech. Des (March,2021)
Discussion of “A Review of Propulsion, Power, and Control Architectures for Insect-Scale Flapping Wing Vehicles” by E. F. Helbling and R. J. Wood (Helbling, E. F., and Wood, R. J., 2018, ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 70(1), p. 010801)
Appl. Mech. Rev (January,2018)
Design Intent
J. Mech. Des (March,2010)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Layer Arrangement Impact on the Electromechanical Performance of a Five-Layer Multifunctional Smart Sandwich Plate
Advanced Multifunctional Lightweight Aerostructures: Design, Development, and Implementation
Multiscale Methods for Lightweight Structure and Material Characterization
Advanced Multifunctional Lightweight Aerostructures: Design, Development, and Implementation
Design Optimization of Multifunctional Aerospace Structures
Advanced Multifunctional Lightweight Aerostructures: Design, Development, and Implementation