Commonality, or the use of the same components among products in a product family, has been considered an effective approach to design a product family. By implementing commonality, a firm can reduce the number of distinct components, component inventory, and inventory cost. However, product design may change and product cost may increase due to using common components that may require different interface conditions and be more expensive than the initially considered components. While the benefits and challenges are well recognized, simultaneous optimization of commonality, product family design, and inventory decisions has not been comprehensively studied. In this paper, we present an approach to integrate commonality, product family design, and inventory decisions by incorporating inventory-related costs in the profit formula. In the proposed approach, (1) commonality matrix is defined to assign product demands to components and component costs to products, (2) continuous inventory review policy is used to calculate safety inventory, (3) joint ordering is implemented to calculate inventory-replenishment lot size and cycle inventory, and (4) cycle service level (CSL) and expected number of component shortage per replenishment cycle (ESC) are utilized to calculate inventory-understock costs. The design of three beverage containers is used as an illustrative example to demonstrate the proposed approach, and sensitivity analysis is performed to contrast commonality and product family design of the three beverage containers with and without incorporating inventory decisions.
Issue Section:
Design for Manufacture and the Life Cycle
References
1.
Collier
, D. A.
, 1981
, “The Measurement and Operating Benefits of Component Part Commonality
,” Decis. Sci.
, 12
(1
), pp. 85
–96
.2.
Collier
, D. A.
, 1982
, “Aggregate Safety Stock Levels and Component Part Commonality
,” Manage. Sci.
, 28
(11
), pp. 1296
–1303
.3.
Baker
, K. R.
, Magazine
, M. J.
, and Nuttle
, H. L. W.
, 1986
, “The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model
,” Manage. Sci.
, 32
(8
), pp. 982
–988
.4.
Gerchak
, Y.
, Magazine
, M. J.
, and Gamble
, A. B.
, 1988
, “Component Commonality With Service Level Requirements
,” Manage. Sci.
, 34
(6
), pp. 753
–760
.5.
Deza
, A.
, Huang
, K.
, Liang
, H.
, and Wang
, X. J.
, 2018
, “On Component Commonality for Periodic Review Assemble-to-Order Systems
,” Ann. Oper. Res.
, 265
(1
), pp. 29
–46
.6.
Mohebbi
, E.
, and Choobineh
, F.
, 2005
, “The Impact of Component Commonality in an Assemble-to-Order Environment Under Supply and Demand Uncertainty
,” Omega
, 33
(6
), pp. 472
–482
.7.
Heese
, H. S.
, and Swaminathan
, J. M.
, 2006
, “Product Line Design With Component Commonality and Cost-Reduction Effort
,” Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage.
, 8
(2
), pp. 206
–219
.8.
Bernstein
, F.
, Kök
, A. G.
, and Xie
, L.
, 2011
, “The Role of Component Commonality in Product Assortment Decisions
,” Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage.
, 13
(2
), pp. 261
–270
.9.
Lee
, H. L.
, 1993
, “Design for Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Examples
,” Perspectives in Operations Management
, R. K.
Sarin
, ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers
, Boston, MA
, pp. 45
–65
.10.
Zinn
, W.
, and Bowersox
, D. J.
, 1988
, “Planning Physical Distribution With the Principle of Postponement
,” J. Bus. Logist.
, 9
(2
), pp. 117
–136
.11.
Zinn
, W.
, 1990
, “Developing Heuristics to Estimate the Impact of Postponement on Safety Stock
,” Int. J. Logist. Manage.
, 1
(2
), pp. 11
–16
.12.
Lee
, H. L.
, Billington
, C.
, and Carter
, B.
, 1993
, “Hewlett-Packard Gains Control of Inventory and Service Through Design for Localization
,” Interfaces
, 23
(4
), pp. 1
–11
.13.
Lee
, H. L.
, and Sasser
, M. M.
, 1995
, “Product Universality and Design for Supply Chain Management
,” Prod. Plann. Control: Manage. Oper.
, 6
(3
), pp. 270
–277
.14.
Lee
, H. L.
, and Tang
, C. S.
, 1997
, “Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation
,” Manage. Sci.
, 43
(1
), pp. 40
–53
.15.
Garg
, A.
, and Tang
, C. S.
, 1997
, “On Postponement Strategies for Product Families With Multiple Points of Differentiation
,” IIE Trans.
, 29
(8
), pp. 641
–650
.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:101856591710316.
Doğru
, M. K.
, Reiman
, M. I.
, and Wang
, Q.
, 2010
, “A Stochastic Programming Based Inventory Policy for Assemble-to-Order Systems With Application to the W Model
,” Oper. Res.
, 58
(4 Pt. 1
), pp. 849
–864
.17.
Albrecht
, M.
, 2014
, “Determining Near Optimal Base-Stock Levels in Two-Stage General Inventory Systems
,” Eur. J. Oper. Res.
, 232
(2
), pp. 342
–349
.18.
Lu
, L.
, Song
, J.-S.
, and Zhang
, H.
, 2015
, “Optimal and Asymptotically Optimal Policies for Assemble-to-Order N- and W-Systems
,” Nav. Res. Logist.
, 62
(8
), pp. 617
–645
.19.
Song
, J.-S.
, and Zhao
, Y.
, 2009
, “The Value of Component Commonality in a Dynamic Inventory System With Lead Times
,” Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manage.
, 11
(3
), pp. 493
–508
.20.
Bernstein
, F.
, DeCroix
, G. A.
, and Wang
, Y.
, 2011
, “The Impact of Demand Aggregation Through Delayed Component Allocation in an Assemble-to-Order System
,” Manage. Sci.
, 57
(6
), pp. 1154
–1171
.21.
Gershenson
, J. K.
, and Prasad
, G. J.
, 1997
, “Modularity in Product Design for Manufacturing
,” Int. J. Agile Manuf.
, 1
(1
), pp. 99
–109
.22.
Gershenson
, J. K.
, Prasad
, G. J.
, and Allamneni
, S.
, 1999
, “Modular Product Design: A Life-Cycle View
,” J. Integr. Des. Process Sci.
, 3
(4
), pp. 13
–26
.https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-integrated-design-and-process-science/jid3-4-0223.
Gershenson
, K.
, Prasad
, G. J.
, and Zhang
, Y.
, 2003
, “Product Modularity: Definitions and Benefits
,” J. Eng. Des.
, 14
(3
), pp. 295
–313
.24.
Gershenson
, K.
, Prasad
, G. J.
, and Zhang
, Y.
, 2004
, “Product Modularity: Measures and Design Methods
,” J. Eng. Des.
, 15
(1
), pp. 33
–51
.25.
Simpson
, T. W.
, Siddique
, Z.
, and Jiao
, J.
, 2006
, Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications
, Springer
, New York
.26.
Simpson
, T. W.
, Jiao
, J.
, Siddique
, Z.
, and Hölttä-Otto
, K.
, 2014
, Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design: Methods & Applications
, Springer
, New York
.27.
Simpson
, T. W.
, 2004
, “Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise
,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des., Anal. Manuf.
, 18
(1
), pp. 3
–20
.https://doi.org/10.1017/S089006040404002828.
Jiao
, J.
, Simpson
, T. W.
, and Siddique
, Z.
, 2007
, “Product Family Design and Platform-Based Product Development: A State-of-The-Art Review
,” J. Intell. Manuf.
, 18
(1
), pp. 5
–29
.29.
Otto
, K.
, Hölttä-Otto
, K.
, Simpson
, T. W.
, Krause
, D.
, Ripperda
, S.
, and Moon
, S. K.
, 2016
, “Global Views on Modular Design Research: Linking Alternative Methods to Support Modular Product Family Concept Development
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 138
(7
), p. 071101
.30.
Kim
, G.
, Kwon
, Y.
, Suh
, E. S.
, and Ahn
, J.
, 2016
, “Analysis of Architectural Complexity for Product Family and Platform
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 138
(7
), p. 071401
.31.
Ripperda
, S.
, and Krause
, D.
, 2017
, “Cost Effects of Modular Product Family Structures: Methods and Quantification of Impacts to Support Decision Making
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 139
(2
), p. 021103
.32.
Chowdhury
, S.
, Messac
, A.
, and Khire
, R. A.
, 2011
, “Comprehensive Product Platform Planning (CP3) Framework
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 133
(10
), p. 101004
.33.
Moon
, S. K.
, and McAdams
, D. A.
, 2012
, “A Market-Based Design Strategy for a Universal Product Family
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 134
(11
), p. 111007
.34.
Liu
, Y.
, Lim
, S. C. J.
, and Lee
, W. B.
, 2013
, “Product Family Design Through Ontology-Based Faceted Component Analysis, Selection, and Optimization
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 135
(8
), p. 081007
.35.
Cao
, Y.
, Luo
, X. G.
, Kwong
, C. K.
, Tang
, J. F.
, and Zhou
, W.
, 2012
, “Joint Optimization of Product Family Design and Supplier Selection Under Multinomial Logit Consumer Choice Rule
,” Concurrent Eng.: Res. Appl.
, 20
(4
), pp. 335
–347
.36.
Moon
, S. K.
, Park
, K. J.
, and Simpson
, T. W.
, 2014
, “Platform Design Variable Identification for a Product Family Using Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization
,” Res. Eng. Des.
, 25
(2
), pp. 95
–108
.37.
Eichstetter
, M.
, Müller
, S.
, and Zimmermann
, M.
, 2015
, “Product Family Design With Solution Spaces
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 137
(12
), p. 121401
.38.
Wacker
, J. G.
, and Trelevan
, M.
, 1986
, “Component Part Standardization: An Analysis of Commonality Sources and Indices
,” J. Oper. Manage.
, 6
(2
), pp. 219
–244
.39.
Jiao
, J.
, and Tseng
, M. M.
, 2000
, “Understanding Product Family for Mass Customization by Developing Commonality Indices
,” J. Eng. Des.
, 11
(3
), pp. 225
–243
.40.
Kota
, S.
, Sethuraman
, K.
, and Miller
, R.
, 2000
, “A Metric for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 122
(4
), pp. 403
–410
.41.
Thevenot
, H. J.
, and Simpson
, T. W.
, 2007
, “A Comprehensive Metric for Evaluating Component Commonality in a Product Family
,” J. Eng. Des.
, 18
(6
), pp. 577
–598
.42.
Thevenot
, H. J.
, Alizon
, F.
, Simpson
, T. W.
, and Shooter
, S. B.
, 2007
, “An Index-Based Method to Manage the Tradeoff Between Diversity and Commonality During Product Family Design
,” Concurrent Eng.: Res. Appl.
, 15
(2
), pp. 127
–139
.43.
Alizon
, F.
, Shooter
, S. B.
, and Simpson
, T. W.
, 2009
, “Assessing and Improving Commonality and Diversity Within a Product Family
,” Res. Eng. Des.
, 20
(4
), pp. 241
–253
.44.
Martin
, M. V.
, and Ishii
, K.
, 2002
, “Design for Variety: Developing Standardized and Modularized Product Platform Architectures
,” Res. Eng. Des.
, 13
(4
), pp. 213
–235
.45.
Sered
, Y.
, and Reich
, Y.
, 2006
, “Standardization and Modularization Driven by Minimizing Overall Process Effort
,” Comput.-Aided Des.
, 38
(5
), pp. 405
–416
.46.
Thevenot
, H. J.
, and Simpson
, T. W.
, 2006
, “Commonality Indices for Product Family Design: A Detailed Comparison
,” J. Eng. Des.
, 17
(2
)pp. 2006, pp. 99
–119
.47.
Simpson
, T. W.
, Bobuk
, A.
, Slingerland
, L. A.
, Brennan
, S.
, Logan
, D.
, and Reichard
, K.
, 2012
, “From User Requirements to Commonality Specifications: An Integrated Approach to Product Family Design
,” Res. Eng. Des.
, 23
(2
), pp. 141
–153
.48.
Jung
, S.
, and Simpson
, T. W.
, 2016
, “An Integrated Approach to Product Family Redesign Using Commonality and Variety Metrics
,” Res. Eng. Des.
, 27
(4
), pp. 391
–412
.49.
Lee
, H. L.
, and Billington
, C.
, 1992
, “Managing Supply Chain Inventory: Pitfalls and Opportunities
,” Sloan Manage. Rev.
, 33
(3
), pp. 65
–73
.https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/managing-supply-chain-inventory-pitfalls-and-opportunities/50.
Fixson
, S. K.
, 2005
, “Product Architecture Assessment: A Tool to Link Product, Process, and Supply Chain Design Decisions
,” J. Oper. Manage.
, 23
(3–4
), pp. 345
–369
.51.
Ülkü
, S.
, and Schmidt
, G. M.
, 2011
, “Matching Product Architecture and Supply Chain Configuration
,” Prod. Oper. Manage.
, 20
(1
), pp. 16
–31
.52.
Chiu
, M.-C.
, and Okudan
, G.
, 2011
, “An Integrative Methodology for Product and Supply Chain Design Decisions at the Product Design Stage
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 133
(2
), p. 021008
.53.
Chiu
, M.-C.
, and Okudan
, G. E.
, 2014
, “An Investigation on the Impact of Product Modularity Level on Supply Chain Performance Metrics: An Industrial Case Study
,” J. Intell. Manuf.
, 25
(1
), pp. 129
–145
.54.
Chung
, W.-H.
, Kremer
, G. E. O.
, and Wysk
, R. A.
, 2014
, “A Modular Design Approach to Improve Product Life Cycle Performance Based on the Optimization of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 136
(2
), p. 021001
.55.
Kremer
, G. E. O.
, Ma
, J.
, Chiu
, M.-C.
, and Lin
, T.-K.
, 2013
, “Product Modularity and Implications for the Reverse Supply Chain
,” Supply Chain Forum: Int. J.
, 14
(2
), pp. 54
–69
.56.
Chung
, W.-H.
, Okudan Kremer
, G. E.
, and Wysk
, R. A.
, 2014
, “Life Cycle Implications of Product Modular Architectures in Closed Loop Supply Chain
,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
, 70
(9–12
), pp. 2013
–2028
.57.
Das
, K.
, and Rao Posinasetti
, N.
, 2015
, “Addressing Environmental Concerns in Closed Loop Supply Chain Design and Planning
,” Int. J. Prod. Econ.
, 163
, pp. 34
–47
.58.
Fujita
, K.
, 2014
, “Global Product Family Design: Simultaneous Optimal Design of Module Commonalization and Supply Chain Configuration
,” Advances in Product Family and Product Platform Design: Methods & Applications
, T. W.
Simpson
, J.
Jiao
, Z.
Siddique
, and K.
Hölttä-Otto
, eds., Springer
, New York
.59.
Huang
, G. Q.
, Zhang
, X. Y.
, and Lo
, V. H. Y.
, 2007
, “Integrated Configuration of Platform Products and Supply Chains for Mass Customization: A Game-Theoretic Approach
,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage.
, 54
(1
), pp. 156
–171
.60.
Zhang
, X.
, and Huang
, G. Q.
, 2010
, “Game-Theoretic Approach to Simultaneous Configuration of Platform Products and Supply Chains With One Manufacturing Firm and Multiple Cooperative Suppliers
,” Int. J. Prod. Econ.
, 124
(1
), pp. 121
–136
.61.
Thonemann
, U. W.
, and Brandeau
, M. L.
, 2000
, “Optimal Commonality in Component Design
,” Oper. Res.
, 48
(1
), pp. 1
–19
.62.
Takai
, S.
, and Sengupta
, S.
, 2017
, “An Approach to Evaluate the Profitability of Component Commonality
,” ASME J. Mech. Des.
, 139
(7
), p. 074501
.63.
Chopra
, S.
, and Meindl
, P.
, 2015
, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation
, 6th ed., Prentice Hall
, Boston, MA
.64.
Qin
, L.
, 2017
, “How Many Cups Does Starbucks Use in A Day?,” accessed Oct. 26, 2017, https://www.leozqin.me/leo-does-the-math-how-many-cups-does-starbucks-use-in-a-day/Copyright © 2019 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
