Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is carried out using long, narrow instruments and significantly reduces trauma to the body, postoperative pain, and recovery time. Unfortunately, the restricted access conditions, limited instrument motion, and degraded sense of touch inherent in MIS result in new perceptual-motor relationships, which are unfamiliar to the surgeon and require training to overcome. Current training methods do not adequately address the needs of surgeons interested in acquiring these skills. Although a significant amount of research has been focused on the development of sensorized systems for surgery, there is still a need for a system that can be used in any training scenario (laparoscopic trainer, animal laboratories, or real surgery) for the purpose of skills assessment and training. A sensorized laparoscopic instrument has been designed that is capable of noninvasively measuring its interaction with tissue in the form of forces or torques acting in all five degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) available during MIS. Strain gauges attached to concentric shafts within the instrument allow the forces acting in different directions to be isolated. An electromagnetic tracking system is used for position tracking. Two prototypes of the sensorized instrument were constructed. Position calibration shows a maximum root mean square (RMS) error of 1.3 mm. The results of the force calibration show a maximum RMS error of 0.35 N for the actuation force, 0.07 N in the x and y directions, and 1.5Nmm for the torque calibration with good repeatability and low hysteresis. Axial measurements were significantly affected by drift, noise, and coupling leading to high errors in the readings. Novel sensorized instruments for skills assessment and training have been developed and a patent has been filed for the design and operation. The instruments measure forces and torques acting at the tip of the instrument corresponding to all five DOFs available during MIS and provide position feedback in six DOFs. The instruments are similar in shape, size, and weight to traditional laparoscopic instruments allowing them to be used in any training environment. Furthermore, replaceable tips and handles allow the instruments to be used for a variety of different tasks.

1.
Romanow
,
R. J.
, 2002, “
Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada—Final Report
,” Commission of the Future of Health Care in Canada, http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/pdf/romanow/pdfs/HCC_Final_Report.pdfhttp://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/pdf/romanow/pdfs/HCC_Final_Report.pdf
2.
Derossis
,
A. M.
,
Fried
,
G. M.
,
Abrahamowicz
,
M.
,
Sigman
,
H. H.
,
Barkun
,
J. S.
, and
Meakins
,
J. L.
, 1998, “
Development of a Model for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills
,”
Am. J. Surg.
0002-9610,
175
, pp.
482
487
.
3.
Feldman
,
L. S.
,
Hagarty
,
S. E.
,
Ghitulescu
,
G.
,
Stanbridge
,
D.
, and
Fried
,
G. M.
, 2004, “
Relationship Between Objective Assessment of Technical Skills and Subjective In-Training Evaluations in Surgical Residents
,”
J. Am. Coll. Surg.
1072-7515,
198
(
1
), pp.
105
110
.
4.
Vassiliou
,
M. C.
,
Ghitulescu
,
G. A.
,
Feldman
,
L. S.
,
Stanbridge
,
D.
,
Leffondre
,
K.
,
Sigman
,
H. H.
, and
Fried
,
G. M.
, 2006, “
The MISTELS Program to Measure Technical Skill in Laparoscopic Surgery: Evidence for Reliability
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
20
, pp.
744
747
.
5.
Shimachi
,
S.
,
Fujiwara
,
Y.
, and
Hakozaki
,
Y.
, 2004, “
New Sensing Method of Force Acting on Instrument for Laparoscopic Robot Surgery
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, International Congress Series
, Chicago, IL, Vol.
1268
, pp.
775
780
.
6.
Tavakoli
,
M.
,
Patel
,
R. V.
, and
Moallem
,
M.
, 2005, “
Haptic Interaction in Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery: A Sensorized End-Effector
,”
Int. Journal of Med. Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
,
1
(
2
), pp.
53
63
.
7.
Dargahi
,
J.
,
Payandeh
,
S.
, and
Parameswaran
,
M.
, 1999, “
A Micromachined Piezoelectric Teeth-Like Laparoscopic Tactile Sensor: Theory, Fabrication and Experiments
,”
Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, Detroit, MI, pp.
299
304
.
8.
Takashima
,
K.
,
Yoshinaka
,
K.
,
Okazaki
,
T.
, and
Ikeuchi
,
K.
, 2005, “
An Endoscopic Tactile Sensor for Low Invasive Surgery
,”
Sens. Actuators, A
0924-4247,
119
, pp.
372
383
.
9.
Van Meer
,
F.
,
Esteve
,
D.
,
Giraud
,
A.
, and
Gué
,
A. M.
, 2004, “
Si-Micromachined 2D Force Sensor for a Laparoscopic Instrument
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, International Congress Series
, Chicago, IL, Vol.
1268
, p.
1334
.
10.
Tholey
,
G.
,
Pillarisetti
,
A.
,
Green
,
W.
, and
Desai
,
J. P.
, 2004, “
Design, Development, and Testing of an Automated Laparoscopic Grasper With 3-D Force Measurement Capability
,”
S.
Cotin
and
M.
Metaxas
, eds.,
International Symposium on Medical Simulation 2004, LNCS 3078
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York
, pp.
38
48
.
11.
Dubois
,
P.
, 2002, “
In Vivo Measurement of Surgical Gestures
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
49
(
1
), pp.
49
54
.
12.
Basdogan
,
C.
,
De
,
S.
,
Kim
,
J.
,
Muniyandi
,
M.
,
Kim
,
H.
, and
Srinivasan
,
M. A.
, 2004, “
Haptics in Minimally Invasive Surgical Simulation and Training
,”
IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl.
0272-1716,
24
(
2
), pp.
56
64
.
13.
Rosen
,
J.
and
Hannaford
,
B.
, 2001, “
Markov Modeling of Minimally Invasive Surgery Based on Tool/Tissue Interaction and Force/Torque Signatures for Evaluating Surgical Skills
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
48
(
5
), pp.
579
591
.
14.
Hanna
,
G. B.
,
Drew
,
T.
,
Arnold
,
G.
,
Fakhry
,
M.
, and
Cuschieri
,
A.
, 2008, “
Development of Force Measurement System for Clinical Use in Minimal Access Surgery
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
22
, pp.
467
471
.
15.
Bicchi
,
A.
,
Canepa
,
G.
,
De Rossi
,
D.
,
Iacconi
,
P.
, and
Scilingo
,
E. P.
, 1996, “
A Sensorized Minimally Invasive Surgery Tool for Detecting Tissutal Elastic Properties
,”
Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, Minneapolis, MN, pp.
884
888
.
16.
Gupta
,
V.
,
Reddy
,
N. P.
, and
Batur
,
P.
, 1996, “
Forces in Surgical Tools: Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Surgical Forceps
,”
Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp.
223
224
.
17.
Hannaford
,
B.
,
Trujillo
,
J.
,
Sinanan
,
M.
,
Moreyra
,
M.
,
Rosen
,
J.
,
Brown
,
J.
,
Leuschke
,
R.
, and
MacFarlane
,
M.
, 1998, “
Computerized Endoscopic Surgical Grasper
,”
Proceedings of the Medicine Meets Virtual Reality
, San Diego, CA, pp.
111
117
.
18.
Rosen
,
J.
and
Hannaford
,
B.
, 1999, “
Force Controlled and Teleoperated Endoscopic Grasper for Minimally Invasive Surgery—Experimental Performance Evaluation
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
46
(
10
), pp.
1212
1221
.
19.
Mayer
,
H.
,
Nagy
,
I.
,
Knoll
,
A.
,
Schirmbeck
,
E.
, and
Bauernschmitt
,
R.
, 2004, “
The EndoPAR System for Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
, Sendal, Japan, pp.
3637
3642
.
20.
Berkelman
,
P. J.
,
Whitcomb
,
L. L.
,
Taylor
,
R. H.
, and
Jensen
,
P.
, 2003, “
A Miniature Microsurgical Instrument Tip Force Sensor for Enhanced Force Feedback During Robot-Assisted Manipulation
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
1042-296X,
19
(
5
), pp.
917
922
.
21.
Peirs
,
J.
,
Clijnen
,
J.
,
Reynaerts
,
D.
,
Van Brussel
,
H.
,
Herijgers
,
P.
,
Corteville
,
B.
, and
Boone
,
S.
, 2004, “
A Micro Optical Force Sensor for Force Feedback During Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery
,”
Sens. Actuators
0250-6874,
115
, pp.
447
755
.
22.
Tonet
,
O.
,
Thoranaghatte
,
R. U.
,
Megali
,
G.
, and
Dario
,
P.
, 2007, “
Tracking Endoscopic Instruments Without a Localizer: A Shape-Analysis-Based Approach
,”
Comput. Aided Surg.
1092-9088,
12
(
1
), pp.
35
42
.
23.
Lynagh
,
M.
,
Burton
,
R.
, and
Sanson-Fisher
,
R.
, 2007, “
A Systematic Review of Medical Skills Laboratory Training: Where to From Here?
,”
Med. Educ.
0308-0110,
41
, pp.
879
887
.
24.
Madan
,
A. K.
and
Frantzides
,
C. T.
, 2007, “
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Trainers for Basic Laparoscopic Skills Acquisition
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
21
, pp.
209
213
.
25.
Cotin
,
S.
,
Stylopoulos
,
N.
,
Ottensmeyer
,
M.
,
Neumann
,
P.
,
Bardsley
,
R.
, and
Dawson
,
S.
, 2005, “
Surgical Training System for Laparoscopic Procedures
,” US Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0142525 A1.
26.
Lin
,
H. C.
,
Shafran
,
I.
,
Yuh
,
D.
, and
Hager
,
G. D.
, 2006, “
Towards Automatic Skills Evaluation: Detection and Segmentation of Robot-Assisted Surgical Motions
,”
Comput. Aided Surg.
1092-9088,
11
(
5
), pp.
220
230
.
27.
Maciel
,
A.
,
Liu
,
Y.
,
Ahn
,
W.
,
Singh
,
T. P.
,
Dunnican
,
W.
, and
De
,
W.
, 2008, “
Development of the VBLaST: A Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Skill Trainer
,”
Int. J Med. Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery
,
4
(
2
), pp.
131
138
.
28.
Rosen
,
J.
,
Brown
,
J. D.
,
Chang
,
L.
,
Barreca
,
M.
,
Sinanan
,
M.
, and
Hannaford
,
B.
, 2002, “
The BlueDRAGON—A System for Measuring the Kinematics and the Dynamics of Minimally Invasive Surgical Tools In-Vivo
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
, Washington, DC, pp.
1876
1881
.
29.
Rosen
,
J.
,
MacFarlane
,
M.
,
Richards
,
C.
,
Hannaford
,
B.
, and
Sinanan
,
M.
, 1999, “
Surgeon-Tool Force/Torque Signatures—Evaluation of Surgical Skills in Minimally Invasive Surgery
,”
Proceedings of the Medicine Meets Virtual Reality
, San Francisco, CA, pp.
290
296
.
30.
Rosen
,
J.
,
Solazzo
,
M.
,
Hannaford
,
B.
, and
Sinanan
,
M.
, 2002, “
Task Decomposition of Laparoscopic Surgery for Objective Evaluation of Surgical Residents’ Learning Curve Using Hidden Markov Model
,”
Comput. Aided Surg.
1092-9088,
7
, pp.
49
61
.
31.
Rosen
,
J.
,
Brown
,
J. D.
,
Chang
,
L.
,
Sinanan
,
M. N.
, and
Hannaford
,
B.
, 2006, “
Generalized Approach to Modeling Minimally Invasive Surgery as a Stochastic Process Using a Discrete Markov Model
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
53
(
3
), pp.
399
413
.
32.
Bailey
,
B. E.
, 2001, “
System for Training Persons to Perform Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
,” US Patent No. 6,267,599 B1.
33.
Dunkin
,
B.
,
Adrales
,
G. L.
,
Apelgren
,
K.
, and
Mellinger
,
J. D.
, 2007, “
Surgical Simulation: A Current Review
,”
Surg. Endosc.
,
21
, pp.
357
366
.
34.
National Instruments
, Strain Gauge Configuration Types, NI Developer Zone, http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4172http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4172
35.
Omega Engineering, Inc.
, Positioning Strain Gages to Monitor Bending, Axial, Shear, and Torsional Loads, http://www.omega.com/faq/pressure/pdf/positioning.pdfhttp://www.omega.com/faq/pressure/pdf/positioning.pdf
36.
Pytel
,
M.
, 2005, “
The Development of an Image Based Navigation System for Use in Interstitial Lung Brachytherapy
,” Master thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
37.
Rasband
,
W. S.
and
Image
,
J.
, 1997, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, 1997-2009, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/
38.
Trejos
,
A. L.
,
Patel
,
R. V.
,
Naish
,
M. D.
, and
Schlachta
,
C. M.
, 2008, “
Design of a Sensorized Instrument for Skills Assessment and Training in Minimally Invasive Surgery
,”
Proceedings of the Second IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics
, Scottsdale, AZ, Oct. 19–22, pp.
965
970
.
You do not currently have access to this content.