Fatigue-strength-reduction factors (FSRFs) are used in the design of pressure vessels and piping subjected to cyclic loading. This paper reviews the background and basis of FSRFs that are used in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, focusing on weld joints in Class 1 nuclear pressure vessels and piping. The ASME Code definition of FSRF is presented. Use of the stress concentration factor (SCF) and stress indices are discussed. The types of welds used in ASME Code construction are reviewed. The effects of joint configuration, welding process, cyclic plasticity, dissimilar metal joints, residual stress, post-weld heat treatment, the nondestructive inspection performed, and metallurgical factors are discussed. The current status of weld FSRFs, including their development and application, are presented. Typical fatigue data for weldments are presented and compared with the ASME Code fatigue curves and used to illustrate the development of FSRF values from experimental information. Finally, a generic procedure for determining FSRFs is proposed and future work is recommended. The five objectives of this study were as follows: 1) to clarify the current procedures for determining values of fatigue-strength-reduction factors (FSRFs); 2) to collect relevant published data on weld-joint FSRFs; 3) to interpret existing data on weld-joint FSRFs; 4) to facilitate the development of a future database of FSRFs for weld joints; and 5) to facilitate the development of a standard procedure for determining the values of FSRFs for weld joints. The main focus is on weld joints in Class 1 nuclear pressure vessels and piping. [S0094-9930(00)02703-7]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
fatigue testing, pressure vessels, nuclear reactor instrumentation, welding, shear strength, fatigue cracks, failure (mechanical)
Topics:
Fatigue, Pipes, Pressure vessels, Stress, Welded joints, Fatigue strength, ASME Standards, Welding, Design
1.
Jaske, C. E., 1998, “Report No. 1: Interpretative Review of Weld Fatigue-Strength-Reduction and Stress-Concentration Factors,” Fatigue Strength Reduction and Stress Concentration Factors for Welds in Pressure Vessels and Piping, Bulletin 432, Welding Research Council, Inc., New York, NY.
2.
Harvey, J. F., 1991, Theory and Design of Pressure Vessels, 2nd ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
3.
Iida, K., and Iino, N., 1977, “Effect of Angular Distortion on Fatigue Strength of Transverse Butt Welds in High Strength Steels,” International Institute of Welding Paper XIII, pp. 827–877.
4.
Anon., 1989, Standard Welding Terms and Definitions, ANSI/AWS A3.0-89, American Welding Society, Miami, FL.
5.
Anon., 1994, Structural Welding Code—Steel, ANSI/AWS D1.1-94, American Welding Society, Miami, FL.
6.
Roberts, D. I., Ryder, R. H., and Viswanathan, R., 1985, “Performance of Dissimilar Welds in Service,” Residual-Life Assessment, Nondestructive Examination, and Nuclear Heat Exchanger Materials, ASME, PVP-Vol. 98-1, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 55–63.
7.
Jaske
,
C. E.
, and
O’Donnell
,
W. J.
,
1977
, “
Fatigue Design Criteria for Pressure Vessel Alloys
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
99
, pp.
584
–
592
.
8.
Dieter, G. E., 1976, Mechanical Metallurgy, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY.
9.
Peterson, R. E., 1974, Stress Concentration Factors, Wiley, New York, NY.
10.
Topper
,
T. H.
,
Wetzel
,
R. M.
, and
Morrow
,
JoDean
,
1969
, “
Neuber’s Rule Applied to Fatigue of Notched Specimens
,”
J. Mater.
,
4
, pp.
200
–
209
.
11.
Van der Zanden, A. M., Robins, D. B., and Topper, T. H., 1972, “Fatigue Life Prediction for Weldments with Internal Cavities,” Testing for Prediction of Material Performance in Structures and Components, ASTM STP 515, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 268–284.
12.
Smith
,
K. N.
,
Watson
,
P.
, and
Topper
,
T. H.
,
1970
, “
A Stress-Strain Parameter for the Fatigue of Metals
,”
J. Mater.
,
5
, pp.
767
–
778
.
13.
Leshnoff, S., and Riccardella, P. C., 1992, “Metal Fatigue in Operating Nuclear Power Plants,” EPRI TR-100252, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
14.
Barsom, J. M., and Vecchio, R. S., 1997, “Fatigue Behavior of Weldments,” WRC Bulletin 422, Welding Research Council, Inc., New York.
15.
Lundin, C. D., 1988, “Bibliography on Fatigue of Weldments and Literature Review on Fatigue Crack Initiation from Weld Discontinuities,” WRC Bulletin 333, Welding Research Council, Inc., New York, NY.
16.
Andrews, R. M., and Jones, R. L., 1991, “The Fatigue Performance of Single Sided Closure Welds in Offshore Structures,” Proc. 10th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. III-B, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 377–383.
17.
Baudry, G., Amzallag, C., and Bernard, J. L., 1986, “Fatigue Behavior of Heterogeneous Weldments Between Stainless and Low Alloy Steels,” Fatigue Life: Analysis and Prediction, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, pp. 381–392.
18.
Booth, G. S., 1980, “Constant Amplitude Fatigue Tests on Welded Steel Joints Performed in Air,” European Offshore Steels Research Seminar, The Welding Institute, Cambridge, UK, pp. III/4-1–III/4-15.
19.
Booth, G. S., 1981, “Constant Amplitude Corrosion Fatigue Strength of Welded Joints,” Fatigue in Offshore Structural Steels, Paper 2, Thomas Telford Ltd., London, U.K., pp. 5–16.
20.
Cole, I., and Vittori, O., 1991, “TMCP Steels and the Thickness Effect,” Proc. 10th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. III-B, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 331–337.
21.
Higuchi, M., Nakagawa, A., Chujo, N., Iida, K., Matsuda, F., and Sato, M., 1996, “Effects of Weld Defects at Root on Rotating Bending Fatigue Strength of Small Diameter Socket Welded Pipe Joints,” Pressure Vessels and Piping Codes and Standards, ASME, PVP-Vol. 338, Vol. 1, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 3–10.
22.
Higuchi, M., Nakagawa, A., Hayashi, M., Yamauchi, T., Saito, M., Iida, K., Matsuda, F., and Sato, M., 1996, “A Study on Fatigue Strength Reduction Factor for Small Diameter Socket Welded Pipe Joints,” Pressure Vessels and Piping Codes and Standards, ASME, PVP-Vol. 338, Vol. 1, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 11–19.
23.
Lawrence, F. V., 1990, “Coping with Weldment Geometry in Fatigue Design: Problems and Options,” Sixth Annual North American Welding Research Conference, Columbus, OH.
24.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1983, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Properties for Butt Welded Joints of SB42 Carbon Steel Plate for Boilers and Other Pressure Vessels—Effect of Stress Ratio,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 34, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
25.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1984, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Properties for Butt Welded Joints of SPV50 Steel Plate for Pressure Vessels—Effect of Stress Ratio,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 40, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
26.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1984, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Crack Propagation Properties for Butt Welded Joints of SB42 Carbon Steel Plate for Boilers and Other Pressure Vessels—Effect of Stress Ratio,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 41, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
27.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1985, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Crack Propagation Properties for Butt Welded Joints of SPV50 (Si-Mn, 500N/mm2 YS) Steel Plate for Pressure Vessels—Effect of Stress Ratio,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 46, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
28.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1985, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Properties for Weld and HAZ Materials of SPV50 (Si-Mn, 500N/mm2 YS) Steel Plate for Pressure Vessels,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 47, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
29.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1986, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Properties for Butt Welded Joints of SUS304-HP (18Cr-8Ni) Hot Rolled Stainless Steel Plate—Effect of Stress Ratio,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 53, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
30.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1986, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Crack Propagation Properties for Butt Welded Joints of SUS304-HP (18Cr-8Ni) Hot Rolled Stainless Steel Plate—Effect of Stress Ratio,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 54, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
31.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1987, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Properties for Weld and HAZ Materials of SB42 (C-Si, 420N/mm2 TS) Carbon Steel Plate for Boilers and Other Pressure Vessels,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 57, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
32.
Nishijima, S., et al., 1990, “Data Sheets on Fatigue Properties for Weld and Base Metals of SUS304-HP (18Cr-8Ni) Hot Rolled Stainless Steel Plate,” NRIM Fatigue Data Sheet No. 65, National Research Institute for Metals, Tokyo, Japan.
33.
Radziminski, J. B., Srinivasan, R., Moore, D., Thrasher, C., and Munse, W. H., 1973, “Fatigue Data Bank and Data Analysis Investigation,” UILU-ENG-73-2025, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
34.
Vaessen
,
G. H. G.
,
de Back
,
J.
, and
van Leeuwen
,
J. L.
,
1982
, “
Fatigue behavior of welded steel joints in air and seawater
,”
J. Pet. Technol.
,
34
, No.
2
, pp.
440
–
446
.
35.
Vosikovsky, O., and Bell, R., 1991, “Attachment Thickness and Weld-Profile Effects on Fatigue Life of Welded Joints,” Proc. 10th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. III-B, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 339–362.
36.
Yagi, J., Machida, S., Tomita, Y., Matoba, M., and Soya, I., 1991, “Influencing Factors on Thickness Effect of Fatigue Strength in As-Welded Joints for Steel Structures,” Proc. 10th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. III-B. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 305–313.
37.
Yagi, J., Machida, S., Tomita, Y., Matoba, M., and Soya, I., 1991, “Thickness Effect Criterion for Fatigue Strength Evaluation of Welded Steel Structures,” Proc. 10th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Vol. III-B, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 315–322.
38.
Rodabaugh, E. C., 1983, “Comparisons of ASME Code Fatigue Evaluation Methods for Nuclear Class 1 Piping with Class 2 or 3 Piping, NUREG/CR-3243,” E. C. Rodabaugh Associates, Inc., Hilliard, OH.
39.
Anon., 1969, “Criteria of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Design by Analysis in Sections III and VIII, Division 2,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY.
40.
English
,
W. F.
,
Greene
,
R. L.
,
Hughes
,
D. A.
, and
Post
,
R. I.
,
1978
, “
Discussion of Fatigue Design Criteria for Pressure Vessel Alloys
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
100
, pp.
236
–
238
.
41.
Rodabaugh, E. C., and Moore, S. E., 1971, “Phase Report No. 115-10 on Comparisons of Test Data with Code Methods for Fatigue Evaluation,” ORNL-TM-3520, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
42.
Koves, W. J., 1988, “Comparison Pressure Vessel and Piping Criteria,” Paper No. 88-PVP-5, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY.
43.
Scott, P. M., and Wilkowski, G. M., 1995, “A Comparison of Recent Full-Scale Component Fatigue Data with the ASME Section III Fatigue Design Curves,” Fatigue and Crack Growth: Environmental Effects, Modeling Studies, and Design Considerations, ASME, PVP-Vol. 306, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, pp. 129–138.
44.
Maddox, S. J., 1986, “Fatigue Analysis of Welded Joints Using Fracture Mechanics,” Fatigue Life: Analysis and Prediction, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, pp. 155–166.
45.
Markl
,
A. R. C.
,
1952
, “
Fatigue Tests of Piping Components
,”
Trans. ASME
,
74
, pp.
287
–
303
.
46.
Heald
,
J. D.
, and
Kiss
,
E.
,
1974
, “
Low Cycle Fatigue of Nuclear Pipe Components
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
96
, pp.
171
–
176
.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.