In-service inspection and maintenance assessment of plant and equipment to reduce the risk of failure and hazardous release have been used for many decades as cost-effective procedures in concert with design, material selection, defect criteria, fabrication, and operation/use. Codes and standards have, more recently, sought to provide hazardous release protection as an additional means of reducing risk by means of criteria based on risk (event probability and consequences), including maintenance and inspection. These criteria use risk-based methods for prioritizing inspection and maintenance. In a power station or refinery, for example, the risk of unplanned shut-down is related to the failure or malfunction of a relatively small number of items. Risk-based maintenance and inspection allows efforts to be concentrated on items involving the highest risk, with a proportionate reduction in effort for low-risk items. Hence, base-load operating times can generally be increased, while maintaining the same or reduced level of risk. Maintenance and inspection play a vital role to reduce risk by more accurately quantifying event probability. Where there is a possibility of high-risk catastrophic failure, the consequences and risk to personnel, environment and equipment can be rendered tolerable to negligible if appropriate protective systems are in place with reduced maintenance and inspection. This paper reviews several cases in which the authors have been involved and in which failures would have been prevented if proper risk assessment procedures had been in place or in which assessment of risk was made to prevent failure. [S0094-9930(00)02203-4]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
inspection, maintenance engineering, risk management, pressure vessels, standards, failure (mechanical), high-pressure techniques
Topics:
Failure, Inspection, Maintenance, Risk, Probability, Design, Pressure vessels
1.
Brown, S., ed., 1995, Forensic Engineering—Part I: The Investigation, Analysis, Reconstruction, Causality, Prevention, Risk, and Consequence of the Failure of Engineered Products, ISI Publications, Inc., Humble, TX.
2.
Brown, S. J., 1976, “Pressure Vessel Failure,” Pressure Vessels and Piping: Design and Analysis, Quality Assurance, Applications, Components, ASME PVP-Vol. 4, Ch. 5.
3.
Brown, S. J., co-ed., 1977, Failure Data and Failure Analysis, ASME Symposium Pub. Book No. PVP-PB-023.
4.
Brown
,
S. J.
and
Brown
,
T. J.
,
1995
, “
Hazardous Release Protection: Code and Standard Considerations for Pressure Systems
,”
Proc. Safety Prog.
,
14
, No. 4.
5.
Brown, S. J., 1994, “An Overview of the Proposed ASME Code BPTC/HPSC SC6000 Hazardous Release Protection,” South Texas Section AIChE, Process Safety Symposium, Vol. 1, Feb.–Mar., presented at OSHA National Training Center, 1993.
6.
Brown, S. J., Sundararajan, C., and Short, W. E., 1994, “Pipe Risk Analysis—A Case Study,” American Society of Mechanical Engineers Pressure Vessel and Piping Division Conference, ASME PVP-Vol. 285, Minneapolis, MN.
7.
Brown, S. J., Brown, T. J., Sundararajan, C., and Photo, H., 1996, “Breach-Lock Closure Failure: Case History of Design and Hazards Consideration,” Chapter on Hazardous Release Protection, ASME PVP-Vol. 333, Integrity of Structure and Fluid Systems, H. H. Chung, ed.
1.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code Committee SC6000, 2000, Hazardous Release Protection, ASME, New York, NY;
2.
tentative original draft 1981.
1.
Sundararajan, C., 1977, “Risk Based Inspection of Pressure Components in Power and Process Plants,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 119, May.
2.
Brown, S. J., 1992, “Brittle Fracture of a Cast Iron Valve in Oleum and Sulfuric Acid Service,” ASM Metals Handbook of Case Histories in Failure Analysis.
3.
Furtado, H. C., Collins, J. C., and Le May, I., 1997, “Extending the Reliable Operation of Aging Power Stations Through Analysis of Failed Components,” Aging of Materials and Methods for the Assessment of Lifetimes in Engineering Plant—CAPE 97, ed. R. K. Penny, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 147–155.
4.
Furtado, H. C., and Le May, I., 1996, “Damage Evaluation and Life Assessment in High Temperature Plant: Some Case Studies,” IMechE Conf. Trans., Sixth International Conference on Creep and Fatigue, pp. 491–499.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.